|
Introduction to Radobs Optical SETI FilesRadobs 00This copyrighted series of over seventy RADOBS text files were written and uploaded onto Ohio State's private.radobs bulletin board over the past two years. These files contain original material which delineates my (the Sysop, Dr. Stuart A. Kingsley) Optical SETI rationale. The material for the six-part EJASA (the Electronic Edition of the Astronomical Society of the Atlantic, Vol. 3, No. 6, January 1992) paper, which can be found in this conference area (2 - Optical SETI) in a compressed form under the file name EJASA306.ZIP, is based on the ideas developed during the time that these RADOBS files were written. The reader should be aware that these files amount to an historical record of how the author's ideas developed, so that some contradictions will be found in later documents. Minor corrections have been made to some files where I have become aware that there are some numerical errors. The observant reader will notice that there was a shift in emphasis after the first files were written, as I became more confident that it was reasonable to suggest that ETIs had the technical prowess to produce optical transmitter powers in excess of 1 GW, and correspondingly higher EIRPs. When I first started looking into the "sensibility" of the optical approach to SETI, I was rather "conservative", and thought that about 100 MW per beam, and corresponding EIRPs, would be a reasonable limit to ETI transmitter performance. However, as I went into this more deeply, and read what the very limited literature on Optical SETI had to say about powerful optical transmitters and wide bandwidth communications, I realized that perhaps I had been too conservative! Thus, I no longer talk about 1 GW transmitter powers as being the exception, rather as being more typical of what we might expect. Indeed, but for this change, it would not be reasonable to argue for the concept of Amateur Optical SETI, as the received signals would be too weak. Note that this early conservative approach on my part has nothing to do with the practice of normalizing transmitter powers to 1 kW, single transmitter apertures to 10 meters, and signal bandwidths to 1 Hz. This has been done throughout the succeeding documents only as an engineering technique for simplifying subsequent performance calculations. The essence of my Optical SETI rationale, then and now, is that ETIs have the technical prowess to aim very narrow optical beams (visible or infrared) into nearby star systems, beams whose diameters are as small or smaller than the zones of life surrounding such stars, yet are assured of striking their intended planetary target. In a nutshell, this is one of the main points of contention between my viewpoint and that of majority of the SETI community. Composition Date: November 6, 1991 Revision Date: June 1, 1992 File: RADOBS.00 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dr. Stuart A. Kingsley, CEng, * * Consultant, * * MIEE, SMIEEE, * * The Planetary Society, * * Space Studies Institute, * * Columbus Astronomical Society, * * Volunteer, SETI Group, Ohio State. * * * * "Where No Photon Has Gone Before & * * The Impossible Takes A Little Longer" * * __________ * * FIBERDYNE OPTOELECTRONICS / \ * * 545 Northview Drive --- hf >> kT --- * * Columbus, Ohio 43209 \__________/ * * United States * * Tel/Fax: (614) 258-7402 .. .. .. .. .. * * Manual Fax Tone Access Code: 33 . . . . . . . . . . * * Bulletin Board System (BBS): .. .. .. .. * * Modem: (614) 258-1710, * * 300/1200/2400/4800/9600 Baud, MNP, 8N1. * * Email: skingsle@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu * * CompuServe: 72376,3545 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|