|
Optical SETI Survey - General Rationale (Part B)Radobs 7BVersion 1.0 1. Life forms are likely to develop eyes whose response peaks up in a region of the spectrum to reasonably match the spectral peak of their stars. Do you agree? YES DON'T KNOW NO 2. What is more "natural" than to signal in a region of the spectrum where the visual response of intelligent life peaks, and in that part of the electromagnetic spectrum that tells life forms most about their universe. Do you agree? YES DON'T KNOW NO 3. Some have suggested that the reason we have not so far discovered ETI, is for the depressingly simple reason that they are not there, in other words, we are alone. However, it may be that we are tuned to the wrong frequencies and they are transmitting in the optical spectrum. Would you agree that the latter is a distinct possibility? YES DON'T KNOW NO 4. Professor Philip Morrison has suggested to me the following scenario, although he doesn't believe in my optical approach. This scenario, which I have called "Signpost SETI", suggests that the acquisition signal or beacon that we hope to discover in the 1 GHz to 10 GHz region of the microwave spectrum may not be the main signal. Instead, it may just be a very low-bandwidth pointer, signpost or flag, indicating that we should tune to another frequency for their main wide-band high-power transmission channel. It is not clear to me why aliens would do this, unless a sophisticated encoding system was employed in the main channel, or if the main channel was far removed from the signpost, i.e., in the infrared or visible spectrum. Do you think that the philosophy of "Signpost SETI" has some merit? YES DON'T KNOW NO 5. Beamed or targeted communications are much more efficient, and it is unlikely that ATCs would use omnidirectional beams for anything other than very low bandwidth signals, because of the wasteful use of power and the resulting huge powers involved. YES DON'T KNOW NO 6. It is probably impossible for aliens to dechirp their transmitter in all directions for a truly omnidirectional beacon, i.e, they cannot remove their local Doppler transmitting frequency shifts and drift due to velocities and accelerations along the line-of-sight, simultaneously in all directions. This can only be done efficiently for narrow targeted signal beams. Some theoretical work by Bob Dixon in 1973 indicates that there are ways to do this at radio frequencies by feeding modulated noise into a line array. Because the technique employs a frequency-scanned line source, it is not really compatible with anything other than extremely small modulation bandwidths. It is not known how this could be done at optical frequencies. Do you agree that to effectively apply dechirping techniques to wideband systems requires narrow beams? YES DON'T KNOW NO 7. Free-space optical communications is likely to a very mature technology for an advanced technical civilization (ATC). Do you agree? YES DON'T KNOW NO 8. Do you agree with the statement that for an ATC, free-space optical communications is "child's play" and is probably easier for them than microwave technology is presently to us? The very high Effective Isotropic Radiated Powers (EIRPs) produced by this technology allows for very high data-rate communications over vast distances. YES DON'T KNOW NO 9. Of the two principal forms of electromagnetic communication techniques, i.e., radio frequency and optical, advanced space-faring civilizations are more likely to use optical communications than microwave communications for deep-space communication links between their home planet, space probes, spaceships or space colonies. Do you agree? YES DON'T KNOW NO 10. It is likely that ATCs will "spin-off" their mature optical communications technology for interstellar communication purposes. Do you agree with this statement? YES DON'T KNOW NO 11. It could be said that what is alright for NASA should be O.K. for aliens, in that JPL is presently conducting advanced research on laser communication systems to be used with the next generation of deep-space probes. Do you agree with this general philosophy? YES DON'T KNOW NO 12. As mankind moves (emerges) into space, free-space optical communications will become our main means of communications with the outer reaches of the Solar System. Do you believe that this will happen? YES DON'T KNOW NO Score out of 12: YES = DON'T KNOW = NO = December 27, 1990 RADOBS.07B BBOARD No. 289 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dr. Stuart A. Kingsley Copyright (c), 1990 * * AMIEE, SMIEEE * * Consultant "Where No Photon Has Gone Before" * * __________ * * FIBERDYNE OPTOELECTRONICS / \ * * 545 Northview Drive --- hf >> kT --- * * Columbus, Ohio 43209 \__________/ * * United States .. .. .. .. .. * * Tel. (614) 258-7402 . . . . . . . . . . . * * skingsle@magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu .. .. .. .. .. * * CompuServe: 72376,3545 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|