Optical SETI Map Conferences Map Illustrations Map Photo Galleries Map Observations Map Constructing Map
Search Engines Contents Complete Site Map Tech. Support Map Order Equip. Map OSETI Network

Google
Search WWW Search www.coseti.org Search www.oseti.net Search www.photonstar.org Search www.opticalseti.org

colorbar.gif (4491 bytes)

 

History of The COSETI Observatory

A Personal Account

by

Stuart Kingsley

 

laserapp.jpg (22966 bytes)

A terrestrial visible laser reaching out to touch the stars.

 

Coming Attractions - by Stuart Kingsley:

The material presently on this page presents a summary of the self-funded Optical SETI activities carried out by the COSETI Observatory over what is coming up to be nearly a nine year effort.  This material will be incorporated into a more extensive article over the next few months.  It will be more an autobiography than just an account of Optical SETI.

 

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

 

SECTIONS  

Introduction
The Early Years in the United Kingdom
Schools
Choosing a Career
Astronomical Society of Haringey
Fred Clarke, Sir Arthur C. Clarke and Patrick Moore
Payload Specialist
Bournemouth
Arriving in the United States
First Venture into Astrophysics
Honors
Crisis
Belief in ETIs
First OSETI Activities
Optical SETI Rationale
OSETI Conferences
Vindication
Twenty Five Years of Neglect
Townes versus Oliver
Update
Conclusions
Other Related Materials:

 

Introduction                     

With the advent over the past summer of the SETI Institute and The Planetary Society publicly accepting that the optical approach to SETI was a viable one, the time has come for an account of how my revisit of Optical SETI encouraged the SETI community to rethink its earlier negative opinions about the laser approach.  The arguments for and against the optical approach to SETI mainly boils down to whether one believes that advanced technical ETI civilizations would have the knowledge base and technical prowess to accurately point-ahead target very narrow high-gain laser beams in our direction.  It is also believed that since interstellar dispersion and scintillation effects badly corrupt radio frequency communications, only lasers have the ability to propagate across interstellar space, free of significant distortion, and thus be capable of supporting wideband communications.  In the visible spectrum it is possible to propagate a laser beam over several thousand light years without significant interstellar absorption and scattering, even in the galactic plane.  Other than the 10,600 nm CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) laser wavelength first identified by Nobel Laureate, Charles Townes in 1961, it is difficult to decide if there are many so-called "magic optical wavelengths".  Also, it is by no means clear that ETIs would choose a laser transition for which our atmosphere is essentially transparent.  It may required space-based observatories for success in this venture (see comments at end of article).

You will get to hear how Monte Ross originated the idea, as early as 1965, that short laser pulses would be more effective than monochromatic continuous wave beacons signals and that this would eliminate the need to "guess" the magic optical wavelength -- one would only need to be in the correct wavelength regime for which our telescopes and optical receivers are optimized.  Monte Ross published his thoughts on these matter only four years after Schwartz and Townes (1961) first proposed Optical SETI with monochromatic continuous wave lasers, which itself was one year after the laser was invented by Maiman (1960) and two years after the classic paper by Cocconi and Morrison (1959) that first proposed Microwave SETI.  Frank Drake's Project Ozma (1960) marked the first Microwave SETI observational work.  The one and only time I have met Frank Drake  was on the occasion of the 1993 Santa Cruz Bioastronomy Meeting.  I made a comment to him that perhaps he should have become an optical astronomer, as he had originally planned.  His response was to query why anyone would want to do Optical SETI in cloud-covered Ohio - that perhaps I should move out to Santa Cruz!

 

The Early Years in the United Kingdom

But first, let me describe the circumstances by which I got into this field - an accident if there ever was one.  Have you ever wondered how a person distinguished or somewhat distinguished in one particular scientific field changes his or her field?   Was it due to some mid-life crises?  All will now be revealed.  In the process of hope to encourage others who too may go through a crises or trauma, that they too can pick themselves up, dust themselves down and resume their careers.  It all started in London, England in October 1957, when I was nine years old. . . .

 

sak_uk1.jpg (6004 bytes)

Small beginnings.  Stuart's cardboard-tube refractor in the summer of 1964 mounted on a government-surplus tripod.  Picture taken in the back garden of our South Tottenham home.

 

sakuk_02.jpg (6015 bytes)

Stuart's cardboard-tube refractor in the summer of 1964.  That's me in the picture at age 16 .   Note the plumbline for obtaining the elevation.

 

Stuart's South Tottenham home in London

My mother's South Tottenham home where I lived from May 1957 till June 11, 1981.  Picture taken on June 21, 2000.

 

Schools

 

 

 

Choosing a Career

 

 

 

Astronomical Society of Haringey

 

 

 

Fred Clarke, Sir Arthur C. Clarke and Patrick Moore

 

 

 

Payload Specialist

 

 

 

Bournemouth

 

 

 

Bournemouth Beach, April 1999 (69425 bytes)

View along the beach between Boscombe and Bournemouth.  Photo shows the Bournemouth pier and the BIC Centre (to the right)  where the Conservative Party often holds its annual conference.  See also Bournemouth & Boscombe

 

Arriving in the United States

 

 

 

First Venture into Astrophysics

 

 

 

Honors

 

 

 

Crisis

 

 

 

Belief in ETIs

 

 

 

First OSETI Activities

 

 

 

Optical SETI Rationale

Figure 1 shows the acquisition signal (Signpost SETI).  Generally, SETI has been about looking in the microwave regime for an attention-getting beacon signal.  While some SETI researchers accept that this beacon might point the way to the main signal channel elsewhere in the electromagnetic spectrum, others believe that both the beacon and wideband data channel will be found in the microwave spectrum.  I see no compelling reason why the main wideband signal and beacon cannot both be at the same frequency in the optical spectrum.

 

9010-016.gif (11078 bytes)

Figure 1.  Reproduced from Los Angeles SPIE's OSETI I Conference, January 1993.  Click on the diagram to be taken to the paper.

 

It was the Soviet astronomers, Shvartsman and Beskin, that took up the search for laser pulses during the 70's and 80's.  In the United States, the Cyclops Report, published by NASA in 1972/73, very much put the nails into the OSETI coffin in the western world and the Cyclops Report essentially but not completely, marked the end of interest in the optical approach here in the states.

That said, I do not want to belittle the heroic efforts by Carl Sagan, Frank Drake, John Billingham, Barney Oliver, and Jill Tarter and many others in keeping the SETI flame alight despite criticism from politicians and others.  Indeed, I myself have witnessed the mirth (the giggle factor) caused by mentioning Optical SETI in the associated Free-Space Laser Communications Meetings held by SPIE.  I appreciate that it can't have been easy for the SETI pioneers.  Today, we stand on the threshold of a new era for SETI and optical astronomy, where it will become possible for large numbers of professional and amateur optical astronomers to participate in this exciting adventure -- where old medium-size and large telescopes decommissioned from serious scientific studies because of light pollution effects can be brought out of retirement.  It may also be possible to undertake SERENDIP Optical SETI and piggy-back OSETI research while undertaking conventional optical astronomy.  Furthermore, in time a symbiotic relationship may arise between optical astronomy and optical SETI.  Some of the great telescopes of the world could be commissioned to undertake optical SET research, perhaps conducting it during daylight hours when the telescope is not being used for other purposes.  One thing the OSETI rationale tells us that it is quite possible to do Optical SETI during the day under a clear blue sky.  It tends to blow people's minds when you say that, but the numbers do indicate that this should be possible.

Figure 2 shows a basic Amateur Optical SETI Observatory.  Only a single photodetector is used, which can be a photomultiplier tube (PMT),  an avalanche photodiode (APD) or a CCD array.  The new associated e-commerce site will be selling a fiber optic spectrometer for undertaking this type of monochromatic Optical SETI.

 

9202-001.gif (15145 bytes)

Figure 2.  Reproduced from Los Angeles SPIE's OSETI I Conference, January 1993.  Click on the diagram to be taken to the paper.

 

Figure 3 is a picture of the COSETI Observatory's computerized 10" (25.4 cm) Meade LX200 in the days before an astronomical dome was built to house the telescope and other equipment.

 

predome5.jpg (72693 bytes)

Figure 3.  Reproduced from Los Angeles SPIE's OSETI I Conference, January 1993.  Click on the diagram to be taken to the paper.

 

In 1993, I predicated that by the year 2001, the then NASA SETI High Resolution Microwave Survey (HRMS) would undergo a change and become the High Resolution Microwave & Optical Survey (HRMOS).  This would happen if only because of the expected frustration that would occur as the microwave search continued to produce negative results.  However, in October 1993, just one year after the start of this major NASA SETI program, the project was killed by Congress.  The Targeted Search part of the program later was reborn under the new privatized name "Project Phoenix".  Nevertheless, we are on track for the successor to Project Phoenix to take on a decided optical slant by the year that Sir Arthur C. Clarke thought we would make "Contact" and the next scheduled International Conference on Optical SETI.  Figure 4 shows just some of the major milestones for both types of SETI since 1959.  Underpinning this large base of Microwave SETI knowledge are the original assumptions about the Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) capabilities of ETIs.

 

9308-003.gif (13452 bytes)

Figure 4.  Reproduced from the Santa Cruz Bioastronomy Meeting, August 1993.  Click on the diagram to be taken to the paper.

 

Throughout all the years of marketing OSETI to the world, there has been one steadfast VIP supporter.  He goes by the name Sir Arthur C. Clarke with whom I have a connection stretching back to the early 70's and the Astronomical Society of Haringey (ASH) in Wood Green, London, England.  Arthur once referred to me in a London Times Education Review as a "Maverick Englishman".   I wear that badge with honor, though these days I am also a "Maverick American"!  Here in the states, one of my earliest converts to OSETI was Professor John Kraus, the former Director of the OSU's "Big Ear" Radiotelescope and the author of perhaps the most well-known standard texts on antennas; books that have been used by generations of students.  My connection to "Big Ear" is as a so-called volunteer with Bob Dixon's OSU SETI Group, which is why my main email address is associated with The Ohio State University.  I have no other affiliation with the university.  This is somewhat of a perverse connection because my main contribution to Bob Dixon's Group these past eight and a half years has been to claim that "they are tuned to the wrong frequency"!

This up-coming article will give an account of how I became actively involved in Optical SETI after a very traumatic period in my life, my background and the battles with the SETI establishment over their strong opposition to the approach.  It is because of my background that I had the confidence to do this despite so much negativism from the "big names" in the SETI community.  See my correspondence with the late Dr. Barney Oliver (former Deputy Chief of the NASA SETI Office and the official voice of SETI) and The Planetary Society.   If you click on the RealAudio link at the foot of this page you can hear in his own words Barney's reasons for believing that it was not possible to exploit the high gain potential of laser uplinks, thus making lasers inferior for SETI-type interstellar communication links.  This presentation is taken from SPIE's First International Conference on Optical SETIFigure 5 seeks to compare the ETI EIRPs predicted by various SETI researchers.  You will note that I am very optimistic about the technical capabilities of these advanced ETI civilizations.

 

9308-002.gif (19222 bytes)

Figure 5.  Reproduced from Santa Cruz Bioastronomy Meeting, August 1993.  Click on the graph to be taken to the paper.

 

There was definitely a feeling of deja vu in that when I began my postgraduate photonics career, I was told by a captain of the British fiber optics industry that I was "wasting my time".  Twelve years later I received Britain's highest photonics accolade for my Ph.D. work.  Not bad, if I say so myself, for an 11+ failure (the Brits will understand the reference).  And so much for expert opinion!  Even so, for this writer, his own OSETI activities are bounded somewhat by the hope that the entire idea of Electromagnetic SETI is misguided, and that in time, we will discover means to travel across interstellar space at enormous effective speeds, so that visits to other star systems will be possible in a human lifetime.  The Kingsley Paradox is "Why communicate when you can travel?".

The idea of Optical SETI had probably been at the back of my mind for a decade or more prior to the start of actively researching the approach in the summer of 1990.  At that time, I was completely unaware that OSETI had not only been proposed by other scientists, but that limited observational work had and was being conducted.  Such was the lack of attention given to Optical SETI in the popular media over the past quarter of a century.

Figure 6 shows Monte Ross's idea which I modified to show how a digital pulsed stream of data could be combined with an attention-getting beacon pulse.

 

9408-002.gif (10383 bytes)

Figure 6.  Reproduced from the Jerusalem 45th International Astronautical Congress, October 1994.  Click on the diagram to be taken to the paper.

 

The account will describe my general philosophy in revisiting, promoting and investing my own resources in Optical SETI and how that approach changed as the Internet developed.  What started with a small WildCat Bulletin Board System (BBS) in late 1991 and obviously somewhat restricted to local traffic, eventually matured into a significant Web site with planet-wide access.  The Internet has provided the very powerful and effective means to get these ideas across and bypass the "usual" channels, including the peer-review system.  Indeed, because it was decided early on that it was better to inspire and "teach" the technique to others so that many more observatories, both professional and amateur can be brought online sooner, my own observational activities have taken somewhat of a back seat.  I could have undertaken this work quietly, but chose the more public approach, including the arrangement of two international conferences and a third in the planning stage, under the realization that any type of SETI research is likely to require many man-years of effort before we would be successful in detecting an ETI signal.  Patience is the watchword in this game.  However, 1999 has just seen the addition of a linked e-commerce Web site that will allow other professional and amateur OSETI observatories to obtained some of the materials required to equip their observatories.

Figure 7 shows a photograph of the 10 ft. diameter fiber-glass PRO-DOME 10 (Technical Innovations, Inc.) which now houses the LX200 SCT.  At that time the dome stood 6 ft. high.  The following year an additional 1 ft high wall-ring was added to raise its height to 7 ft., just one or two inches clearance remains beneath the satellite dish when pointing due south.  This is shown in the photograph of Figure 9.  The satellite dish is mainly for receiving "alien" transmissions from the BBC in London, it has nothing to do with the SETI activities of the observatory.

 

posdome3.jpg (35231 bytes)

Figure 7.  Reproduced from the Jerusalem 45th International Astronautical Congress, October 1994.  Click on the diagram to be taken to the paper.

 

 

cosetisn.jpg (12750 bytes)

Figure 8.  The COSETI sign on the backyard fence.

 

 

dome95.jpg (64421 bytes)

Figure 9.  The astronomical dome in the summer of 1995 with the extra wall-ring.

 

The article will also include a brief history of Optical SETI on planet Earth and explain why it is that many of the general popular media accounts of SETI over the past quarter of a century have failed to even mention that there was a viable optical approach to this scientific endeavor.  This account will also, for the record, put right misleading statements issued in recent press releases that would suggest a touch of "revisionist history".  Nothing really has prevented the main-stream SETI researchers from having a more balanced approach to Electromagnetic SETI these past 38 years.  Its is certainly not for lack of terrestrial technology, despite what has recently been claimed.  Frankly, too much time had been spent around the 1.42 GHz so-called "Waterhole" to the exclusion of the major part of the electromagnetic spectrum.  It is time to get out of the water!  Figure 10 indicates the number of photons that can be detected by both large and small telescopes as a function of range assuming a pulse ETI laser beacon system producing a mean optical transmitter power of 1 GW in the form of a single pulse of 1 ns duration transmitted once every second.  Such a pulse is instantaneously about 10 million times the intensity of our sun.  Thus, there would be no problem in detecting such a signal with a small telescope in the full glare of the ETI's star, though it wouldn't be visible to the naked eye.

 

9512-001.gif (20068 bytes)

Figure 10.  Reproduced from San Jose's SPIE's OSETI II Conference, February 1996.  Click on the diagram to be taken to the paper.

 

Larry Klaes is the author of the "Contact" film review and "So you want to get into SETI".   These articles may be found on this and many other Web sites.  He will be the principal author of this historical account.  Larry is the Coordinator for The COSETI Observatory and has been closely involved with my OSETI activities since 1991, after a "chance encounter" on the Internet as a result of my OSETI postings to various space, astronomy and astronautical newsgroups.   Another chance encounter on the Internet was with Carl Helmers of Helmers Publishing, Inc.  This eventually led to Carl launching SETIQuest, which unfortunately stopped publication towards the end of last year, just as Optical SETI was "discovered" by the main-stream SETI community.  Larry became the magazine's first editor.  I hope to see SETIQuest restart in the not too distant future, perhaps as an online magazine, now that OSETI is poised to take off in a big way and likely cause a renascence in amateur optical astronomy.

In pushing for a rethink of the rationale for SETI, my aim was for a more balanced approach.  I look forward to the day when NASA Administrator, Dr. Dan Goldin, can again use the word "SETI" in relation to the "Origins Program", without fear of ridicule and condemnation from Members of Congress.  I hope we see the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) eventually retrofitted for space-based OSETI and the Next Generation Space Telescope (NGST) designed to incorporate instrumentation to undertake both continuous wave and the pulsed laser beacon type of Optical SETI.

 

OSETI Conferences

In 1993, the first SPIE conference on Optical SETI was held at LA Airport.  In 1996, the second conference was held at the San Jose Convention Center.  The covers from the conference proceedings are shown below.  Abstracts and RealAudio versions of the OSETI I presentations are available via links to the proceedings cover on the left.   Abstracts and RealAudio versions of some of the OSETI II presentations are available via links to the proceedings cover on the right.  The Third International Conference on Optical SETI is scheduled for January 22-24, 2001.

 

oseti1cs.jpg (35606 bytes)oseti2cs.jpg (30271 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vindication

Back in September 1998, when the news first publicly broke that the SETI Institute and The Planetary Society would now be supporting several Optical SETI research activities, Larry Klaes, the Coordinator for this Web site and The SETI League, assumed that I would feel the joy of "vindication".  In fact, my response was very subdued at the time.  I have recently been asked that same question by Kelly Beatty, the senior editor for Sky & Telescope.  On consideration and some thought, I think the reasons for my muted response were the following.

I have basically felt for about a quarter of a century that if Electromagnetic SETI is taken to be a sensible scientific activity, then the optical approach to SETI would have significant advantages (for most of that time I had been unaware that it had been proposed and observational work actually done).  So sure have I been in that belief in Optical SETI, that I was prepared to put my "money where my mouth was" and make a major financial commitment on my part to promote the optical approach to SETI over the past eight and a half years.  Also, since years ago I had predicted that by 2001 there would be significant Optical SETI research undertaken by major SETI researchers, it comes as no surprise that the first moves in this direction should come towards the end of this decade.  There had been hints of this for some time as I observed a softening of attitudes (reported elsewhere on this site).  Thus, the news really came as an "anticlimax" to these years of effort.  My reaction is basically "So guys, what took you so long to see the light?".   I had a greater sense of vindication in the late 70's after British Industry and the Americans discovered that optical fibers conveying coherent light could be used for a variety of highly sensitivity sensing systems.  During the mid-70's, I felt that I had been banging my head against a brick wall.  It may have been deja vu, but the second time is never as good as the first!

Of course, one can only be truly "vindicated" if someone detects a laser beacon from an ETI source.  Since, as explained above, my personal beliefs in the future of mankind would have us whizzing around the galaxy in spacecraft that could move at effective speeds faster than light, Optical SETI for me has always been a kind of "hedging one's bets".  I would have very mixed feelings about the first confirmed detection of an ETI signal, be it microwave or laser, since it might well imply that mankind would be for ever locked into the confines of the Sun.

 

Twenty Five Years of Neglect

In the future, when popular books about SETI (on planet Earth) are written, many authors will express puzzlement at to why there was this 25 year hiatus in Optical SETI here in the United States.  It is my view that the blame for this rests with, what is often referred to as "The SETI Bible" -- otherwise known as the Project Cyclops Report.  This report had a substantial effect on the development of SETI, particularly in America.  And it is American SETI that has dominated this activity on planet Earth.  Of course, the really interesting question to ask is why the views of Professor Charles Townes, one of the originators of the optical approach to SETI idea, were not accepted by the main-stream SETI community?  Why was it that Dr. Barney Oliver, principal author of The Cyclops Report, who for a long time was known as the "Official voice of NASA SETI", got the better of the argument?  You will note that I put "on planet Earth" in parentheses.  This is to stress that I think what happened here is an anomaly and probably most intelligent species go for the optical approach to SETI as soon as they decide that Electromagnetic SETI is a sensible scientific pursuit.

 

Townes versus Oliver

 

 

 

Update

 

 

 

Conclusions

 

 

 

Other Related Materials:

 

Dr. Stuart A. Kingsley
First Posted: January 31, 1999
Revised: February 1, 2000
Version 1.04

 

Back to Top

 

 

 


Home Glossary
SPIE's OSETI I Conference SPIE's OSETI II Conference
SPIE's OSETI III Conference
The Columbus Optical SETI Observatory
 
Copyright ©, 1990-2006 Personal Web Site:
www.stuartkingsley.com
Last modified:  10/28/06
Contact Info